February 4, 2012

Review:

The Future of Justification

NT Wright’s ‘portrayal of the gospel – and of the doctrine of justification in particular – is so disfigured that it becomes difficult to recognise as biblically faithful,’ claims US pastor and author John Piper.

A harsh accusation against a leading New Testament scholar, now bishop of Durham, whose scholarly books have shed light on Jesus’ and Paul’s teaching, and who has battled for the evangelical position within the CofE.

The debate is complex and not easily simplified. In essence Wright believes that Paul separates ‘The gospel’ from ‘justification’. The former being the news that Jesus is Lord of all, the latter, ‘the declaration which God makes, that all who share this faith belong to Christ, to his sinforgiven family, the one family of believing Jews and believing Gentiles together, and are assured of final glorification’.

Piper believes Wright’s definitions and reasoning undermine the way (in his view) Christ imputes his righteousness to us, and fears Wright adopts a position close to Catholicism. So Piper is barrister like, pressing his case, using verbatim passages from Wright’s books, and his definition of Greek words, tenses and the flow of NT passages, to press his charge.

His tone is warm and measured but it would be good if he had explained in more detail his presuppositions. I fear he fails to appreciate that Wright has reframed the whole debate. For me Piper’s case is unproven and Wright has defended himself against such charges before.

High: Always valuable to look at such an important doctrine.

Low: Sad that Piper should feel the need to make the attack.

Reviewed by Andy Peck, a former deputy editor at Christianity magazine and a tutor at CWR.

Published by: IVP
Price: £9.99
ISBN: 9781844742509

About this article

Issue published ReviewsAuthorJohn PiperReviewerAndy Peck

Print this page

Search articles

Keywords
Author
Category
Issue